gc_rip
06-14 01:15 AM
While filing I-485 do I have to choose which I-140 and PD to be used. Need your advise which one should I use,
1. I-140 approved with details as: PERM LC (EB3, PD Dec 2006).
2. I-140 pending (just filed) with details regular LC (EB3, PD Nov 2004).
Choices are:
A. Just file 485 with 140 with earlier PD(option2 ), and let both 140 and 485 continue.
B. File 485 with approved 140
C. Convert pending 140 into premium, and file 485. Is the extra $1000 justified for this?
Thanks in advance.
1. I-140 approved with details as: PERM LC (EB3, PD Dec 2006).
2. I-140 pending (just filed) with details regular LC (EB3, PD Nov 2004).
Choices are:
A. Just file 485 with 140 with earlier PD(option2 ), and let both 140 and 485 continue.
B. File 485 with approved 140
C. Convert pending 140 into premium, and file 485. Is the extra $1000 justified for this?
Thanks in advance.
wallpaper and a release date for the
anindya1234
07-02 06:52 AM
For item 16 what should be the CFR code: is it (c)(9) or (c)(0)(9), since there are 3 parentheses...please help!!!!
sourav_bhaduri
08-19 08:38 AM
Hi Experts,
My L1 Individual petition was rejected, the reason was "Individual doesn't have enough specialized knowledge". My question is can I make fresh petition for L1 blanket approval after 6-7 months?
My L1 Individual petition was rejected, the reason was "Individual doesn't have enough specialized knowledge". My question is can I make fresh petition for L1 blanket approval after 6-7 months?
2011 iphone 5 release date uk.
storm
08-11 11:46 AM
May 2007 filers, please post your processing status here:
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
PD: JUNE 2003
I-140 FILED: OCTOBER, 2005
I-140 APPROVED: APRIL, 2006
I-485/EAD FILED: MAY 1, 2007
FP: JUNE 13, 2007
EAD APPROVED: JULY 27, 2007
EAD CARD RECEIVED: AUGUST 2, 2007
I-485 LUD'S - June 13, 2007 - after FP
Sept. 4, 2007 - soft LUD - no status change
Sept. 27, 2007 - card production ordered
Oct. 2, 2007 - approval notice sent
Oct. 4, 2007 - cards received
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
PD: JUNE 2003
I-140 FILED: OCTOBER, 2005
I-140 APPROVED: APRIL, 2006
I-485/EAD FILED: MAY 1, 2007
FP: JUNE 13, 2007
EAD APPROVED: JULY 27, 2007
EAD CARD RECEIVED: AUGUST 2, 2007
I-485 LUD'S - June 13, 2007 - after FP
Sept. 4, 2007 - soft LUD - no status change
Sept. 27, 2007 - card production ordered
Oct. 2, 2007 - approval notice sent
Oct. 4, 2007 - cards received
more...
pradeepd
10-18 02:02 PM
Hi,
I'm currently on my amlost 6th year of my H1B. I have my i-140 (Still valid) approved from my previous employer under EB3. I'm applying for a new PERM with my current employer and I would want to apply in EB2. I hold 3ys bachelor's degree with 12 yrs of experience. My attorney says that chances are either my PERM or I-140 will be denied based on my education qualification.
I'm looking for your advice on the following.
1) I heard that I can apply for 3yr extn based on my previous I-140. Considering that is it worth the fight on EB2. I'm looking to port my PD (Nov 2008) to this I140 if approved.
2) My company sponsers two PERM to be applied, so it is worth to try for EB2 and later if denied on EB3. Will this affect my H1B extensions? say if it's get rejected on EB2, am I not eligible to apply for H1B extension with my current employer, since my labor/i-140 is denied.
Please help. I'm just not able to get this over my head :(
Thanks,
Pradeep
I'm currently on my amlost 6th year of my H1B. I have my i-140 (Still valid) approved from my previous employer under EB3. I'm applying for a new PERM with my current employer and I would want to apply in EB2. I hold 3ys bachelor's degree with 12 yrs of experience. My attorney says that chances are either my PERM or I-140 will be denied based on my education qualification.
I'm looking for your advice on the following.
1) I heard that I can apply for 3yr extn based on my previous I-140. Considering that is it worth the fight on EB2. I'm looking to port my PD (Nov 2008) to this I140 if approved.
2) My company sponsers two PERM to be applied, so it is worth to try for EB2 and later if denied on EB3. Will this affect my H1B extensions? say if it's get rejected on EB2, am I not eligible to apply for H1B extension with my current employer, since my labor/i-140 is denied.
Please help. I'm just not able to get this over my head :(
Thanks,
Pradeep
Flo
01-08 09:23 AM
I've had my I-140, I-485 pending since August 2007 in Nebraska and i just started getting worried recently when i found out that the job title in the I-140 does not match the job name in my labor cert.
My labor cert took 4 years to be approved and in the meantime my job changed. It is still in the same field/department, in the same company, but it just evolved but still requires the same skills as the labor cert.
I was originally on H-1B and now i work with my EAD. My H1B was amended when my job changed but not the labor cert since we were well into the process when all this happened.
This is really the only concern that i have regarding the approval of my I-140 and I-485. Do any of you know if the job name difference would be a problem for the I-140 to be approved? At the least i hope they would send me an RFE and not deny it right away.
Thanks for any advice you could give me!
:o)
My labor cert took 4 years to be approved and in the meantime my job changed. It is still in the same field/department, in the same company, but it just evolved but still requires the same skills as the labor cert.
I was originally on H-1B and now i work with my EAD. My H1B was amended when my job changed but not the labor cert since we were well into the process when all this happened.
This is really the only concern that i have regarding the approval of my I-140 and I-485. Do any of you know if the job name difference would be a problem for the I-140 to be approved? At the least i hope they would send me an RFE and not deny it right away.
Thanks for any advice you could give me!
:o)
more...
bluekayal
02-07 06:34 PM
I just spoke with Chris Nutall of FT who did the interview with Craig Barrett. I've also forwarded Berkeleybee's newest IV ppt and the IV flyer to him.
2010 iPad 3 Mini Info Rumors
nmdial
03-31 12:13 PM
I initially voted in favour of this, but on further reflection, I think this is bad policy and urge others to not support this.
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Thanks for your insight. This is another perspective and it demands further discussion and analysis. The wait time between filing I-485 and receiving the green card is already beyond the norm and a lot of companies are aware of this. Imagine the wait times for the people who haven't yet been able to file for their Adjustment of Status. Wouldn't it help them (and their dependents) if they are at least allowed to file for their AOS? I invite the members to provide their perspectives on the issues raised by JeffDG above. Please do not attack each other. Let us fight together in lieu of fighting each other..
Giving I-485 benefits to people without current PDs is a bad idea. It creates a class of immigrants who are neither non-immigrant visa holders (h1b) nor are they lawful permanent residents (i-551) with a set of rights that falls into neither category. The AoS pending status is intended as a short-duration temporary "gap" coverage for people who are a matter of months from having actual I-551 rights.
Essentially, this proposal aims to make every month into the July 2007 fiasco. In addition, and this is the truly horrible part of it, relieves US employers of the pressure and costs they feel now, extending H1Bs every 3 years. That means that the only allies that legal EB immigrants have (US Employers who require their services) are detached from the immigrants themselves...they no longer have a dog in the hunt, and will stop whatever pressure they are bringing to bear now upon Congresscritters and Senators to increase the number of EB visas available.
Disconnecting the interests of foreign-national employees from their US employers will weaken the political position of the foreign-national employees. We cannot vote or contribute to campaigns, our employers however, can do both. If employees are shifted to EADs and APs, with no further involvement of employers in their immigration status needed, then those employers become disconnected from the process, and the one and only ally the legal immigrant has is no longer interested. That's a horrible thing for the immigrant to advocate.
I strongly urge IV to back away from this proposal, as it is not in the long-term interests of the EB Immigrant community. I urge IV to instead focus their resources on items that will help immigrants long term, like increasing the number of EB visas available through initiatives like eliminating the DV program and allocating the visas to EB applicants.
Thanks for your insight. This is another perspective and it demands further discussion and analysis. The wait time between filing I-485 and receiving the green card is already beyond the norm and a lot of companies are aware of this. Imagine the wait times for the people who haven't yet been able to file for their Adjustment of Status. Wouldn't it help them (and their dependents) if they are at least allowed to file for their AOS? I invite the members to provide their perspectives on the issues raised by JeffDG above. Please do not attack each other. Let us fight together in lieu of fighting each other..
more...
RMF
08-17 02:57 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ReceiptingTimes081707.pdf
Changed the link and tried, seems to work.
Hope it is the right one.
Changed the link and tried, seems to work.
Hope it is the right one.
hair iPad
ragha81
06-10 02:58 PM
Hi,
I filed for H1 petition in August 2009 and it is still pending. Meanwhile I applied for another H1B through a new employer (new employer took over my previous employers business) with premium processing. My latest H1B petition is denied citing Employee-Employer relationship discrepancies.
My attorney basically submitted documents similar to what he did for all other employees but they all got approved. I dont know what went wrong in my case.
I have a Master degree in Computer Engineering from a reputed school in this country as well. Please tell me what my options are to get back into H1B status and start working again.
Thanks,
Raghav
I filed for H1 petition in August 2009 and it is still pending. Meanwhile I applied for another H1B through a new employer (new employer took over my previous employers business) with premium processing. My latest H1B petition is denied citing Employee-Employer relationship discrepancies.
My attorney basically submitted documents similar to what he did for all other employees but they all got approved. I dont know what went wrong in my case.
I have a Master degree in Computer Engineering from a reputed school in this country as well. Please tell me what my options are to get back into H1B status and start working again.
Thanks,
Raghav
more...
vijaysha
07-20 02:01 AM
Can someone give me the site where i can get the current processing dates for PERM?
The Labour certification is going to be filed this month end, in that case how long i have to wait to file I140?
Also i heared that I140 and 485 can be filed together.
Is that true? if so what is required from my side to the attorney for those two stages.
Regards,
Vijay
The Labour certification is going to be filed this month end, in that case how long i have to wait to file I140?
Also i heared that I140 and 485 can be filed together.
Is that true? if so what is required from my side to the attorney for those two stages.
Regards,
Vijay
hot iPad 2: US Release Date
WaitingYaar
09-10 08:47 AM
If H4 uses EAD for work with 485 pending, and if the underlying I-140 gets rejected, will this make H4 holder be out of status? what are the options for H4 holder.
more...
house on iPad release date – 3
Blog Feeds
09-11 08:20 PM
Back in 1986, Immigration Judges denied almost 90% of all asylum requests. Now, during the past 9 months, the Judges granted 50% of asylum requests. What's more, the disparities among various Immigration Judges have narrowed somewhat. This information is contained in a new report issued by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) of the University of Syracuse. This increase in approvals tracks with another important consideration: In 1986, only a little more than half of all asylum applicants were represented by an attorney. Today, over 90% of asylum applicants have attorneys. Attorney-represented asylum seekers have their cases granted 54% of...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/09/asylum-some-progress-but-much-more-needs-to-be-done.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/09/asylum-some-progress-but-much-more-needs-to-be-done.html)
tattoo already talk of an iPad 3.
kirupa
07-07 06:06 AM
Added!
(I also made the image appear when loaded)
(I also made the image appear when loaded)
more...
pictures ipad 2
ncmahesh
07-14 12:15 PM
it was actually recjected it was kept under 221 g in uk , he was returing to india. so he asked embassy to retrun all the papers. so they gave back
dresses iPad 3G Release Date in the US
achandak
12-19 02:35 PM
Hi,
I need some urgent advise. My wife has got a Biometrics appointment notice for 8th Jan. She is in India currently and scheduled to return on 24th Jan. We have already got the appointment rescheduled once (original notice was for 1st Dec). When we got it rescheduled we asked them to give us the next appointment after 1stFeb, but they ignored that part!
I wanted to know can I get it rescheduled again? Will it have any impact on her 485 application? Do I need to enclose any cover letter explaining why i need to reschedule? Any personal experiences with rescheduling the appointment more than once?
Thanks!
I need some urgent advise. My wife has got a Biometrics appointment notice for 8th Jan. She is in India currently and scheduled to return on 24th Jan. We have already got the appointment rescheduled once (original notice was for 1st Dec). When we got it rescheduled we asked them to give us the next appointment after 1stFeb, but they ignored that part!
I wanted to know can I get it rescheduled again? Will it have any impact on her 485 application? Do I need to enclose any cover letter explaining why i need to reschedule? Any personal experiences with rescheduling the appointment more than once?
Thanks!
more...
makeup IPad 3 | Video Downloading and
karthikgk
07-08 04:47 PM
folks
I got my EAD last October (filed for my I-485 on July 02, '07) but did not apply for my AP then;
Now I need to apply for my EAD renewal and am also thinking of getting an AP. Do I need to get an AP for the current year (that is for the time period from Oct '07 to Oc 08) and then apply for AP extension or can I directly apply for AP for Oct '08 to Oct '09?
the second option will save me money and so for me that is the preferred one :D
any information on this is much appreciated,
thanks,
karthik
I got my EAD last October (filed for my I-485 on July 02, '07) but did not apply for my AP then;
Now I need to apply for my EAD renewal and am also thinking of getting an AP. Do I need to get an AP for the current year (that is for the time period from Oct '07 to Oc 08) and then apply for AP extension or can I directly apply for AP for Oct '08 to Oct '09?
the second option will save me money and so for me that is the preferred one :D
any information on this is much appreciated,
thanks,
karthik
girlfriend iPhone 5 and iPad 3 with iOS
GCwaitforever
09-07 01:30 PM
Personally I agree with you. On the other hand, there could be some folks who like this sh*t. :D :D It is just an FYI for them.;)
hairstyles Release date leaked?
Blog Feeds
12-21 07:10 AM
With regard to export compliance, the new Form I-129 includes a new Part 6, entitled �Certification Regarding the Release of Controlled Technology or Technical Data to Foreign Persons in the United States� which requires petitioners that seek to employ foreign nationals in H, L, and O nonimmigrant visa status to certify that the company (i) has reviewed the Export Administration Regulations (�EAR�) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (�ITAR�), and (ii) made a determination as to whether or not an export control license is required to release any controlled technology or technical data to the foreign national.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/12/h-1b-petitioners-beware-new-affirmation-requirement-regarding-release-of-controlled-technology-or-technical-data-to-foreign.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/12/h-1b-petitioners-beware-new-affirmation-requirement-regarding-release-of-controlled-technology-or-technical-data-to-foreign.html)
Pineapple
07-12 10:51 PM
Tragic. But how on earth is this related to us???
If you have to open new threads, at least check if it is relevant.
Refugees from Sudan have a tough time with USCIS, let alone people from other nations. Refugees from Sudan have a tough time. Period. It is sad, and we should do what we can to help those less fortunate than us. Again, period. No ifs and buts about it. But is this the right forum, or even the right website?
There is plenty of clutter on these forums.. (And frustratingly, it has spiked a lot in the last week or so). Please do not add to it.
If you have to open new threads, at least check if it is relevant.
Refugees from Sudan have a tough time with USCIS, let alone people from other nations. Refugees from Sudan have a tough time. Period. It is sad, and we should do what we can to help those less fortunate than us. Again, period. No ifs and buts about it. But is this the right forum, or even the right website?
There is plenty of clutter on these forums.. (And frustratingly, it has spiked a lot in the last week or so). Please do not add to it.
Lasantha
10-05 09:26 AM
This is the link. But the catch is only your employer or your attorney can create a login for this.
http://www.plc.doleta.gov/eta_start.cfm?actiontype=home&CFID=2143265&CFTOKEN=28003131
http://www.plc.doleta.gov/eta_start.cfm?actiontype=home&CFID=2143265&CFTOKEN=28003131
No comments:
Post a Comment